Repository logo
 

Critical analysis of the independence of environmental assessment practitioners in South Africa.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorKidd, Michael Anthony.
dc.contributor.authorButhelezi, Gugulethu Patricia.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T06:15:56Z
dc.date.available2020-11-13T06:15:56Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionMasters Degree. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.en_US
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental Assessment Practitioners (EAPs) are at the centre of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. Their competence and ethics, therefore, are crucial in facilitating the EIA process. This research aims to analyse the extent to which the current South African (SA) EIA regulations ensure EAP independence. The key findings from other professions that place emphasis on independence reveal that factors such as financial interest, prior relations and managerial advisory services, competency, contractual arrangements, close personal relations and government and political influence interfere with independence. In the SA context, the independence of EAPs continues to be debated even after vigorous changes in the EIA regulations. The recent regulation of the EAP profession in SA marks a much-needed intervention. However, it does not guarantee EAP independence while they are still being appointed by the project proponent. Results from Kenya and Botswana do not expressly state in their EIA regulations that they have EAP independence. It appears that international practice places more emphasis on the views and opinions of the affected communities during the public participation process rather than EAP independence. In parallel, Intervenor Funding is adopted to provide financial assistance to the affected communities to encourage their participation during the EIA process in order for the process to be objective. Thus, there is still potential to strengthen EAP independence in SA. In order to achieve the desired outcome of independence, the Competent Authority (CA) must appoint EAPs on behalf of the project proponents rather than allowing EAP-client relationships. Moreover, adoption of the Intervenor Fund concept, where EAPs will be compensated for their services, is a concept that SA should consider.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/18831
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental assessment practitioners.en_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental impact assessment.en_US
dc.subject.otherEAP profession.en_US
dc.subject.otherRegulation of assessors.en_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental management.en_US
dc.titleCritical analysis of the independence of environmental assessment practitioners in South Africa.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Buthelezi_Gugulethu_2020.pdf
Size:
650.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Buthelezi_Gugulethu_Patricia_2020.pdf
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.64 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Masters Degrees (Environmental Law)