A case study of the quality assurance role of the school management team in teaching and learning at a secondary school.
dc.contributor.advisor | Naicker, Inbanathan. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ndlovu, Ntombifikile Sweetness. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-13T14:24:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-13T14:24:11Z | |
dc.date.created | 2024 | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description | Masters Degree. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban. | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanisms used by the school management team (SMT) to quality assure teaching and learning. The focus of this study was to explore the leadership practices used by the SMT of the selected township secondary school in quality assurance with regard to teaching and learning. The study aimed at answering these following research questions: What mechanisms are employed by the school management team to quality assure teaching and learning in the case study school? How effective are the mechanisms employed by the school management team to quality assure teaching and learning in the case study school? and; How can quality assurance in teaching and learning be improved in the case study school? Five SMT members (Principal, deputy principal and three departmental heads) from one secondary school were purposively selected based on their characteristics and experience. The distributed leadership theory by Helen Gunter (2005) and the conceptual framework for quality education in schools by Elizabeth Garira (2020) underpin this study. Using an interpretive paradigm, qualitative research approach and case study research design, I conducted semi-structured interviews to generate primary data from the participants. I also used three documents (Quality Management Systems, School Improvement Plan and curriculum coverage monitoring tool) that were requested from the research site to obtain secondary data. The analysis of data was done using thematic analysis. Findings point to that there is a disparity in leadership practices by the SMT. They separate the school into two phases, namely, the Further Education and Training phase (FET) and the General Education and Training phase (GET), and their focus is mainly on the FET. Monitoring seems to start from grade 12 to lower grades; extra classes are implemented only in the FET phase, and tracking of learner performance is mainly done in grade 12. The main recommendation was that The SMT distribute the power to the subject heads, who are de facto teacher leaders, to assist in other management duties. They can also delegate the work to the Learner Representative Council so that all the school grades can be attended to. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10413/23389 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.subject.other | Quality assurance in teaching and learning. | |
dc.subject.other | School leadership practices. | |
dc.subject.other | School management team. | |
dc.title | A case study of the quality assurance role of the school management team in teaching and learning at a secondary school. | |
dc.type | Thesis |