A critical analysis of South Africa’s coastal access laws in light of the principle of coastal environmental justice.
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The purpose of this dissertation is to critically analyse the right to perpendicular coastal access in
section 13 of the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act 24
of 2008 (NEM: ICMA), as well as the right to parallel coastal access in section 18 of the Act, to
determine whether and to what extent these access rights are capable of achieving the NEM:
ICMA’s overarching object of equitable access to the coastal zone and whether and to what extent
they advance the goal of environmental justice in South Africa.
An analysis of the approach taken by the eThekwini Municipality towards implementing the
provisions of section 13 and especially section 18 of the NEM: ICMA reveals some of the
difficulties the statutory framework gives rise to. One of these is the relative lack of detail in the
statutory provisions themselves. Another is the heavy burden they place on the local government,
namely municipalities. The third implementation challenge arises out of the requirement for each
local municipality to adopt its own unique set of by-laws which has the potential to create an
inconsistency in the approach taken across all municipalities in the implementation process since
the legal provisions require each local municipality to develop its own local by-laws to give effect
to the coastal access provisions.
An alternative and potentially better approach may be found in the statutory provisions governing
public access to the coast in England and Scotland. Whilst both these countries may not have had
the same historical disadvantages experienced in South Africa, they however serve as good
comparators given the geographical similarities to South Africa. Not only do both countries have
long coastlines similar to South Africa they have also both relatively recently conferred statutory
rights of access to the coast on the public. More importantly, both countries have adopted very
different approaches to securing a right to coastal public access. While Part Nine of the English
Marine and Coastal Access Act of 2009 makes provision for a dedicated coastal access route
around the entire country, Part One of the Scottish Land Reform (Scotland) Act of 2003 goes much
further and makes provision for a general “right to roam” on foot across the entire country.
Being informed by the statutory provisions governing public access to the coast in England and
Scotland , some novel ideas have been unpacked to provide a basis for rethinking the approach to
coastal public access in South Africa; one which is much bolder and more far reaching and thus
more consistent with the notion of equitable access and environmental justice. These include
creating a dedicated access route along the entire South African coastline, forming an external body such as a Coastal Agency for South Africa to develop and monitor the implementation of an
outdoor code of coastal conduct. These novel ideas have the potential to broaden the scope and
extent of conferring equitable access rights in South Africa to the extent that it subscribes to the
principles of coastal environmental justice.
Description
Masters Degree. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.